McGUINTY LIBERALS TURN DOWN
FREER SPEECH AND TRANSPARENCY AT MUNICIPAL LEVEL
For Immediate Release
April 7, 2005 (Queen’s Park) –
Simcoe North MPP Garfield Dunlop criticized the
McGuinty government today for turning against
elected municipal councillors and elected school
board trustees by voting down Bill 165, the Elected
Officials Immunity Act.
“It was our hope to get this bill into
committee where elected municipal officials could
provide input,” said Dunlop. “It’s
a disappointing day for the Liberals’ so-called
‘democratic renewal’ when they publicly
oppose equality in speaking privileges for their
municipal and school board counterparts.”
Introduced by Oshawa MPP Jerry Ouellette, Bill
165 was intended to extend to municipal politicians
certain rights and privileges that are currently
granted to Members of Provincial Parliament.
If passed, the bill would have granted other
elected officials the same privilege of speech
found under Section 37 of the Legislative Assembly
of Ontario Act. This section states that, “A
member of the Assembly is not liable to any civil
action or prosecution, arrest, imprisonment or
damages, by reason of any matter or thing the
member brought by petition, bill, resolution,
motion or otherwise, or said before the Assembly
or a committee thereof.”
EXCERPT FROM GARFIELD DUNLOP’S
SPEECH DURING SECOND READING DEBATE TODAY ON BILL
165:
“First of all, I want to say that I was
pleased to see that the bill was circulated to
municipalities across the province. I know that
two of the larger municipalities in my riding,
the Town of Midland and the City of Orillia, both
supported this bill. I have a lot of confidence
in the workings of those two municipal councils,
and the staff that work for the towns of Midland
and Penetanguishene. I also understand the member
for Oshawa received support from the Township
of Ramara on this private member’s bill
as well. I’m not sure what other ones came
in from my riding.
Mr. Speaker, as you probably are aware, a lot
of us in this House have been members of municipal
councils over the years. I myself had 18-and-a-half
years in municipal council work, and I felt that
as a municipal council member, I worked just as
hard at doing my job as a councillor, a reeve
and a deputy mayor, as I do representing the people
as an MPP, if you look at the responsibilities
we have.
There is a certain protection we have in this
Assembly, and we get that protection during all
the debate times, during Question Period. As you
know and as the member brought forward, those
same privileges are not extended to municipal
council members, and a lot of people on school
boards as well. I think they deserve that right.
For example, quite often, people who are on municipal
councils – most of them are not full-time
jobs. In a lot of cases, these people run businesses,
they are teachers, and they belong to other professions.
A lot of people join municipal councils as a result
of their strong support for and love of their
communities. They want to make their community,
whether it’s a township, a city or a small
village, a better place to live. I think in a
lot of cases, because they don’t have the
privileges that are extended to the 103 MPPs here,
that may be a reason why people would not run
for an elected position on some of the councils.
That is hindering the process in a certain way.
Just because of this aspect alone, we might be
turning our back on a lot of very promising elected
officials across this province who may like to
run.”
Contacts:
Garfield Dunlop
(705) 327-4500 (cell)
|