Mr.
Garfield Dunlop (Simcoe North): My question
is again for the Acting Premier.You are aware
that we are now holding committee hearings on
Bill 56, the Emergency Management Statute Law
Amendment Act, 2005.
Hon. Michael Bryant (Attorney General):
Is that where all your members are?
Mr. Dunlop: That's good, from
someone who just won a major award.
Acting Premier, last Thursday we listened to
deputations. Most of them did not support the
bill. A few people did support it, but most
of the people at the hearings wanted to make
a lot of amendments to the legislation. Minister,
in particular, the Ontario Society for the Prevention
of Cruelty to Animals clearly pointed out that
animals have been totally excluded from this
legislation and that there should be an emergency
plan included on the safety and evacuation of
animals. Both Kashechewan and Katrina indicated
the need for good emergency plans for animal
and animal welfare.
Acting Premier, will you see that the government
amendments come forward to include animals in
Bill 56?
Hon. Dwight Duncan (Minister of Finance,
Chair of the Management Board of Cabinet):
This government takes committee hearings very
seriously, unlike the previous government. Goodness
gracious, I had forgotten about the numbers
around committee hearings. Why don't we just
go over them again? The Tories used time allocation
on 102 occasions over eight years. Just to add
insult to injury, they did time allocation with
no committee hearings at all on 43 major pieces
of legislation. Then they did time allocation
with no committee and no third reading debate.
That is no debate and no committee on 22 major
pieces of legislation.
This government is proud of its record of holding
hearings. We are holding hearings on virtually
every piece of major legislation. We listen
carefully to what the people have to say in
committee. We amend bills after committee, unlike
the previous government.
This government is making this Legislature work
on this issue and many others. The days of no
debate are gone; they're --
The Speaker (Hon. Michael A. Brown):
Thank you. Supplementary?
Mr. Dunlop: Acting Premier,
that's just about the most pathetic answer I've
ever heard anybody from that side of the House
make. That is pathetic.
Acting Premier, in case of a major emergency,
when people need to be evacuated, they quite
often refuse to go and leave their pets alone.
You are already refusing to act on the Grant
Thornton report recommendations on the future
of the OSPCA. The OSPCA is receiving only $119,000
in funding from the province, in spite of increased
numbers, in spite of recommendations in the
Grant Thornton report, and it now appears that
you don't even want to help animals in case
of an emergency.
You asked for the Grant Thornton report. It's
your report. Minister, what have you got against
the welfare of pets? Why do you not appreciate
the fine work being done by the OSPCA in Ontario?
Hon. Mr. Duncan: That's a
real dog of a question. Let me tell you, you
cut funding to animal welfare. You refused to
deal with the issues.
I'm going to answer the question for Fido over
there. Here's what we've done so far. We have
invested $2 million in one-time funding to offset
increased financial pressures at the OSPCA.
Sound financial management is part of that organization's
long-term plan. It is their responsibility.
Our government remains committed to working
with the OSPCA, working through long-standing
governance issues. We agreed to fund the governance
review. We also agreed to fund an independent
audit to assist OSPCA officials in making sound
planning decisions.
We're working with the OSPCA on this, on emergency
matters. We are having public hearings on an
emergency bill. This government's record cannot
be questioned by that member, who had eight
years to do something and refused to do anything
other than cut funding like they did, not only
for animals --
The Speaker: Thank you. New
question.
Mr. Klees: On a point of order,
Mr. Speaker: I'm sure that most members of this
House would take offence at the words used by
the Acting Premier directed toward the member
for Simcoe. None of us in this place should
be subjected to that. We are all honourable
members, and I would ask that the member withdraw
his comment.
The Speaker: If there was
something of offence -- I did not hear anything
myself but if there was -- Minister of Finance.
Interjections.
The Speaker: All right, New
question.